Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19807/2026 on 5 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 19747 of 2026 along with
connected matters.
Decided on : 5
th November
, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19747 of 2026. Sunil Kumar & Anr. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
2. CWP No. 19788 of 2026. Anju ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
3. CWP No. 19857 of 2026. Raj Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
4. CWP No. 19807 of 2026. Divya ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.
5. CWP No. 19858 of 2026. Seema Dogra & Anr. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
6. CWP No. 19860 of 2026.
Yagya Chand ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
7. CWP No. 19864 of 2026. Goverdhan Singh ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
8. CWP No. 19862 of 2026. Lokesh Thakur ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
9. CWP No. 19866 of 2026. Pradeep Kumar Verma ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
10. CWP No. 19868 of 2026. Poonam
...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
11. CWP No. 19870 of 2026. Kesari Devi
...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Phupinder Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocates. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned DEputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2.
3. Learned Deputy Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters.
4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024
respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms thereof.
5. With the above observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 5th November, 2026.
(jai)