Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19880/2026 on 5 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.19880 of 2026
Decided on: 5th November, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajender Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Rajesh Kosh, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3, respectively.
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation (Annexure P-4) seeking applicability of State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Versus Sheela Devi2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 SLP (Civil) No.10399/2020, decided on 07.08.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:09:37 :::CIS
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/ competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents not averse to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 05, 2026
Judge Mukesh
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:09:37 :::CIS