Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/20007/2026 on 5 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 20007 & 20008 of 2026
Decided on: 05.11.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CWP No. 20007/2026
Pushpa Devi & Anr.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
CWP No. 20008/2026
Anita Kumari & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Gopal Krishan Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 5545/2022, decided on 26.06.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:10:52 :::CIS
2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
05th November, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:10:52 :::CIS