Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/20040/2026 on 5 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.20040 of 2026
Decided on: 05.11.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Kuldip Singh
....Petitioner
Versus UCO Bank and Ors.
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, learned counsel, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner retired from the service of the respondent-Bank at the age of 60 years on 31.03.2026. He has claimed several reliefs in this writ petition, asserting he is entitled to different amounts under different heads.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted relief No. (i) claimed by the petitioner was though rejected by the respondents on 27.03.2026, i.e. prior to petitioner's
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:11:34 :::CIS
superannuation, however, the facts documented in the said rejection at Annexure P-19 have not been depicted correctly. Qua the other reliefs claimed in the writ petition, petitioner's grievance as projected by his learned counsel is that petitioner's claims in that regard are still pending adjudication with the respondents.
3. While looking to the nature of petitioner's claims, it is deemed appropriate to direct respondent No. 3 / competent authority to consider this writ petition as petitioner's representation, and take appropriate call in accordance with law, applicable rules, regulations/ instructions and decide petitioner's claims under different heads including relief No. (i) which apparently has not found favour with respondent No. 4 in terms of Annexure P-19. Fresh decision be taken within eight weeks. The decision so taken be also communicated to the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge November 5, 2026 R.Atal
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:11:34 :::CIS