Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./546/2026 on 5 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:49040
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.546 of 2026 Decided on: 05th November, 2026 __________________________________________________________ Deep Ram
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4- State. Mr. Rajinder Kumar, Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Rajana, present in person. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Mr. Rajinder Kumar, Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Rajana is present in person. He tenders an unconditional and unqualified apology. The same is accepted.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 has produced a copy of Authorization of Pension granted on 03.11.2026, which is taken on record.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:13:01 :::CIS
3. A perusal of the aforesaid authorization issued by the Office of the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Himachal Pradesh reveals that the petitioner has been held entitled to pension w.e.f. 01.04.2023.
4. This Court while disposing of the writ petition on 06.11.2025 had directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the decision passed in CWP No.2711 of 2017, titled, Baldev vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
5. Once the competent authority has now issued the authorization to grant the pension to the petitioner, respondents No.1 to 5 have to pay the pension and arrears to the petitioner. It is made clear that in case the arrears and pension are not released in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to take an appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
6. The present execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 05th November, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:13:01 :::CIS