Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./660/2026 on 5 November 2026
2026:HHC:49087
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.660
of 2026
a/w Execution Petition No.661 of 2026
Decided on: 05
th November, 2026
_______________________________________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Execution Petition No.660
of 2026
Brig. (Retd.) Lokinder Singh Thakur ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents ________________________________________________________
2. Execution Petition No.661
of 2026
Shailendra Nigam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Ajay Kochhar Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1- State, in both the petitions. Ms. Supriya Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.2, in both the petitions. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3, in both the petitions. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 04.11.2026 issued by the Joint Secretary
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:13:04 :::CIS
(Personnel) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh along with letter dated 04.11.2026 issued by the Additional Secretary, H.P. Public Service Commission, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid instructions reveals that the payment of interest accrued on the salary arrears payable to the petitioners has been released.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the said fact.
4. In view of the aforesaid instructions, since the mandate contained in the common judgment dated 19.04.2012, passed in CWP No.2190 of 2007, titled, Lt. General (Retd.) B.S. Thakur and others vs. State of H.P. & others, has duly been complied with, the execution petitions are disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th November, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:13:04 :::CIS