Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./2397/2026 on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2397 of 2026 Decided on: 05.11.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar and another

...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Puneet, Advocate vice Mr. Hirdaya Ram, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

, Judge

(Oral)

Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of instructions dated 04.11.2026, issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of office order dated 28.10.2026 passed by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), District Sirmaur at Nahan (HP), which are taken on record.

2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioners were regularized in the year 2017 and they have completed two years of regular service in the year 2019 and the benefit of two years to fix their pay in the

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:13:19 :::CIS

higher stage has already been granted to them.

3. This Court while disposing of CWP No.18883 of 2025 on 02.12.2025 preferred by the petitioners had only given direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-4 colly).

4. After passing of the order by this Court, the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), District Sirmaur at Nahan (HP) has decided the representations of the petitioners and rejected the same.

5. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 02.12.2025, passed in CWP No.18883 of 2025, titled, Sanjay Kumar & others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, has duly been complied with, the present execution petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioners are aggrieved by the aforesaid office order, they may avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

th November

, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:13:19 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead