Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19597/2026 on 4 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 19596 & 19597/2026
Decided on: 04.11.2026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19596/2026
Jagdish Kumar Dhiman
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
2. CWP No. 19597/2026
Salochana Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representations annexed with these writ petitions seeking
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:14:40 :::CIS
2 applicability of Madan Lal Vs. State of H.P. and Anr2. have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
04th November, 2026 rohit
2 CWP No. 3341/2019 decided on 04.09.2021 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:14:40 :::CIS