Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19635/2026 on 4 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 19636/2026 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 04.11.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19636/2026
Anuradha Kumari & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
.…Respondents
2. CWP No. 19634/2026
Jagmohan Singh
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
3. CWP No. 19635/2026
Manohar Lal
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
4. CWP No. 19632/2026
Dinesh Kumar & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
5. CWP No. 19629/2026
Shailja Katoch
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents …………………………………………………………………………….
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
For the petitioner: M/s Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Jagmohan Sharma, & Surila Sangam, Advocates, for the petitioners in the respective petitions.
For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta Additional, Advocate General in all the petitions.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in all the petitions.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and 2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025
decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 04th November, 2026(rohit)