Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19674/2026 on 4 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19674/2026 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 04.11.2026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19674/2026
Rajan Thakur
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
2. CWP No. 19672/2026
Luxmi Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
3. CWP No. 19673/2026
Anju Bala
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Aashish Patial, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:17:10 :::CIS
2
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2. have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
3. Learned vice counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
04th November, 2026 rohit
2 CWP No. 1747 of 2023, decided on 09.10.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 06/11/2026 03:17:10 :::CIS