CWP/19684/2026 on 4 November 2026

1. CWP No. 19680/2026

Satish Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents

2. CWP No. 19682/2026

Pankaj Patial

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents

3. CWP No. 19683/2026

Madan Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents

4. CWP No. 19684/2026

Pradeep Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioner: Ms. Saroj, Advocate vice Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith Advocate.

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2. have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.

3. Learned vice counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.

4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks 2 CWP No. 1747 of 2023, Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.

from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Judge

04th November, 2026 rohit