Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19717/2026 on 4 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.19715 of 2026 and
connected matters
Decided on: 04.11.2026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19715 of 2026
Parmesh Sharma and Ors
…..Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CWP No. 19717 of 2026
Parveen Chand and Ors
…..Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CWP No. 19718 of 2026
Ajay Kumar and Ors
…..Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners:
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy
Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in all the writ petitions.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from
2 CWP No. 1747 of 2023, decided on 09.10.2023
today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 4, 2026
Judge R.Atal