Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP.M/1041/2026 on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Criminal Revision(FC) No.64 of 2024 a/w Cr.MP(M) No.1280 of 2023 & CMP(M) No.1041 of 2026 Decided on: 04.11.2026 Criminal Revision (FC) No.64 of 2024 Master Chandra Veer (Minor) & another … Petitioners Versus Shri Dev Raj Singh Bhati … Respondent Cr.MP(M) No.1280 of 2023 in Cr.RST No.4184 of 2023 Sh. Dev Raj Singh Bhati … Applicant/Petitioner. Versus Master Chandra Veer (Minor) & another … Non-applicants/Respondents CMP(M) No.1041 of 2026 in FAO(FC)ST No.20921 of 2026 Sh.Dev Raj Singh … Applicant/Petitioner. Versus Smt. Ankita Bhati … Non-applicant/Respondent.
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s): Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner, in Criminal Revision (FC) No.64 of 2024. Mr. Anshul Attri, Advocate, for the applicant, in Cr.MP(M) No.1280 of 2023. Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP(M) No.1041 of 2026. For the respondent(s): Mr. Anshul Attri, Advocate, for the respondent in Criminal Revision (FC) No.64
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
of 2024. Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the the non-applicant, in Cr.MP(M) No.1280 of 2023 and in Cr.MP(M) No.1041 of 2026. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In the course of hearing of these matters, the same were referred for mediation, so that endeavour could be made by the parties to have the matter amicably settled between them.
2. The Court stands informed that mediation between the parties has been successful and the parties have decided to put an end to the issues raised before this Court in terms of the agreement entered into between the learned Mediator as is recorded in terms of the report of learned Mediator.
3. Accordingly, these cases are disposed of in terms of the report of learned Mediator, dated 14.10.2026, which shall form part of this order. The parties are directed to abide by the agreement entered into between them.
4. As far as the Demand Draft deposited by the father is concerned, the same is ordered to be released in favour of the children through their mother. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal)
Judge
November 04, 2026 (Rishi)