Delhi High Court

ARB.P./1367/2026 of M/S PACIFICA (INDIA) PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs M/S CNA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ARB.P. 1367/2026

$~10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010359932026

+

ARB.P. 1367/2026, I.A. 21201/2026, I.A. 21292/2026

M/S PACIFICA (INDIA) PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Prashant

Mehta,

Sr.

Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev

Kumar Sharma, Ms. Niharika

Tiwari, Mr. Anirudh Sharma,

Mr.

Shakhyam

Agrawal,

Advocates.

versus

M/S CNA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate

for R-1 and 2.

Mr. Vinit Trehan and Ms.

Bhumi Agarwal, Advocates for

Intervenor.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

%

04.11.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submit that they are nominating their nominee Arbitrator, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, former Chief Justice, Bombay High Court (Mob. No. 9818000130).

2. The Petitioner has already nominated Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, former Judge, Supreme Court of India as their nominee Arbitrator (Mob. No. 8800555332). Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:05.11.2026 17:06:39 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1367/2026

3. Both the Arbitrators shall appoint the Presiding Arbitrator within three weeks to adjudicate the disputes arising between the parties.

4. Mr. Vinit Trehan along with Ms. Bhumi Agarwal, learned Counsel appears for the Intervenor submits that he has filed an intervening application and that the said application is coming up on 06.11.2026.

5. This Court is of the opinion that the same can be filed before the learned Tribunal. He submits that he may be given the liberty to file the application. Needless to state that the liberty is always there to file the application for impleadment before the learned Tribunal who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

6. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J NOVEMBER 4, 2026/pa

Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:05.11.2026 17:06:39 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead