Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

GTPL HATHWAY LTD vs MEHER COMMUNICATION on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated:

03/11/2026

BROADCASTING PETITION/96/2025

Petitioner Name:

Gtpl Hathway Ltd

Versus

Respondent Name: Meher Communication

BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON

HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER

For Applicants/Appellants/

Petitioners Advocate

Mr. Nasir Husain

For Respondents Advocate

Ms. Kavya Singh

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. We have heard learned counsel for petitioner at length who has pointed out that despite the order dated 28.09.2026, neither the respondent has deposited Rs.7.89 lacs nor anybody is appearing on behalf of respondent.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submitted that they have no instructions in this matter despite the copy of the order dated 28.09.2026 has been supplied to the owner of the respondent.

3. Hence, we hereby issued Bailable Warrant in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- upon Ms.Sumita Shyam Gedam, proprietor of M/s Mehar Communication R/o NEAR EAKVIRA VIDYUT COLONY, PRAKASH NAGAR, V.M.V. AMRAVATI-444604, MAHARASHTRA. Dasti/Direct service upto Head of aforesaid Police Station. The details furnished by the petitioner are as under:

POLICE STATION DETAILS OF RESPONDENT

M /S MEHER COMMUNICATION

­­­­­­­THROUGH ITS PROPRIETORESS MS. SUMITA SHYAM GEDAM

HAVING OFFICE AT:-

C/O SAHEBRAO KENE NEAR EAKVIRA VIDYUT COLONY

PRAKASH NAGAR, V.M.V. AMRAVATI-444604

MAHARASHTRA.

The Station Head Officer

Gadgenagar Police station

Address of Police Station: New Cotton market Road, Shegaon Naka Chowk, Gadgenagar, Amravati-444604 .

4. The Head of aforesaid Police Station will serve the Bailable Warrant upon the aforesaid person of the respondent and after completing the formalities of grant of Bail and after taking the signature, the paper will be returned to this Tribunal immediately.

5. This Bailable Warrant has been issued to secure the presence of the proprietor of the respondent before this Tribunal either as a party-in-person or through learned counsel on her behalf.

6. This matter is, therefore, adjourned on 22.01.2027.

( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON

( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER

/AS/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead