Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

BANK OF BARODA AND ANR vs Gulshan Kumar Batra on 27 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**

**Misc. Appeal No. 60/2021

Arising out of SA No. 45/2021 (DRT-I, Delhi)**

**Item No. 18**

**Bank of Baroda & another

V

Gulshan Kumar Batra**

**27.10.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain**

Present: Sh. Amit Mahaliyan, Advocate for appellants through VC

This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The respondent filed S.A. bearing No. 45/2021 titled as **Gulshan Kumar Batra v. Bank of Baroda & another**. The DRT-Allahabad while having additional charge of DRT-I, Delhi vide order dated 25.02.2021 has passed the following directions:-

5. Having considered the rival submissions, advanced by the Ld. counsels for both the parties. Since the S. Applicant has already paid more than Rs.1.75 lacs after declaring the account as NPA and are further ready to pay a substantial amount against outstanding dues.

6. In my view, a prima facie case is made out in favour of the S. Applicant. The S. Applicant is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.2.00 lacs on or before 01.03.2021. He is further directed to deposit another sum of Rs.3.00 lacs within next 15 days i.e. on or before 16.03.2021. In case the aforesaid amounts are deposited by the S. Applicants within the stipulated time, the respondent bank/Court receiver are restrained from taking the physical possession of property in question. However, it is made clear that in case the S. Applicant is failed to deposit the aforementioned amount within the stipulated time, the respondent bank shall be at liberty to proceed with its SARFAESI action in accordance with law. So far as stay of auction scheduled for 20.03.2021 is concerned, the said issue will be decided on the next date after seeing the conduct of S. Applicant.

2. Sh. Amit Mahaliyan, Counsel for the appellant stated that the respondent has complied with the direction as mentioned in para 6 of the order dated 25.02.2021 by depositing Rs. 2 lacs on before 01.03.2021 and further Rs.3 lacs on or before 16.03.2021. The impugned order was passed 25.02.2021.

3. After keeping view the totality of the circumstances of the S.A. bearing No. 45/2021 is pending since long, the present appeal is disposed with the direction to the DRT-I, Delhi to decide the S.A. bearing No. 45/2021 on or before 30.06.2027 in accordance with law. The pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of.

sd - **(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain)** **Chairperson**

-N

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead