Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Mukesh Kumar vs INDIAN BANK on 27 October 2026
**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**
**Misc. Application No.115/2026
In Misc. Appeal No. 369/2026
Arising out of SA No. 83/2025 (DRT-II, Delhi)**
**Item No. 05**
**Mukesh Kumar
V
Indian Bank**
**27.10.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain**
Present: Sh. Gaurav Srivastava, Advocate for applicant through VC
Ms. Seema Gupta, Advocate for respondent bank through VC
This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.
**Misc. Application No. 115/2026**
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 1. The instant application is filed with the prayer for direction to the respondent for maintaining the *status quo* with respect to the subject property bearing House No.89 measuring are 320 sq. yds. situated at village Naharpur Rupa, Tehsil & District Gurgaon with further direction to the respondent to disclose the complete particulars of the auction purchaser.
2. 2. Sh. Gaurav Srivastava, Counsel for the appellant stated that this Tribunal vide order dated 16.10.2026 has disposed of the Misc. Appeal No. 369/2026 with the liberty to the applicant being the appellant to file appropriate application for impleading the auction purchaser and to make prayer for necessary relief against the respondent as well as auction purchaser within a week and DRT was also directed to consider the said application in accordance with law. Sh. Gaurav Srivastava, Counsel for the applicant further stated that the in compliance of the order dated 16.10.2026 the particulars of the auction were not supplied to the applicant.
3. 3. Ms. Seema Gupta, Counsel for respondent Indian Bank stated that the auction purchaser had deposited the entire sale money on 23.10.2026 and on that day the complete particulars of the auction purchaser was supplied to the Counsel for the applicant / appellant.
4. In view of the submission made by the respective Counsels for the parties and particularly by Ms. Seema Gupta, Counsel for respondent, the applicant being the appellant is given further 10 days' time to make appropriate application as per para 3 of the order dated 16.10.2026 and thereafter DRT-II, Delhi shall pass appropriate order on the said application in accordance with law. The present application stands disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain) Chairperson
-N