Central Administrative Tribunal

ABHISHEK YADAV vs SHRI SATENDRA SINGH IAS SECRETARY MINISTARY OFHOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.17/ C-5

CP No.825/2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI

C.P. No. 825/2026 in

O.A. No. 2181/2026

This the 03rd day of November, 2026

Hon’ble Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)

Hon’ble Mr. Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Abhishek Yadav, Age: 39 years Senior Hindi Translator, Group 'B' S/o Shri. Keshry Nandan Yadav R/o Q. No. 72 Type-IV, Saqid Nagar, Delhi-110049

2. Izhar Hussain, Age: 34 years S/o Shri. Zakir Hussain Senior Hindi Translator, Group 'B' R/o Flat No. B-5, Sankalp Apartments, Sector-64, Faridabad, Haryana-121004

... Petitioner (By Advocate : Mr. G.D. Chawla)

Versus

1. Shri Satendra Singh, IAS, Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110011. Now shifted to Room No. 919, Sanklp Bhawan, K.G Marg, New Delhi-110001. Email: secyurban@nic.in

2. Satinder Pal Singh Director General, CPWD Room No. 102, 1st Floor, Vidyut Bhawan, Shankar market, Connaught Place, New Delhi Vidyut Bhawan, Shankar Market New Delhi-110011. Email: cpwd_dgw@nic.

…Respondents (By Advocate: Mr. Satpal Singh)

2026.11.05 16:16:06+05'30' DAYAWATI

Item No.17/ C-5

CP No.825/2026 ORDER (ORAL) By Hon’ble Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A):- When taken up, learned counsel for the respondents produces a copy of speaking order dated 30.10.2026 passed by the respondents in compliance with the directions of this Tribunal issued by order dated 29.05.2026 and accordingly, he presses for closure of the present CP.

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that though the respondents have passed speaking order, however, they are not satisfied with the order dated 30.10.2026 passed by the respondents.

3. We have perused the directions issued by this Tribunal vide order dated 29.05.2026, and have also examined the order dated 30.10.2026 passed by the respondents. Upon such consideration, we are satisfied that the respondents have fully complied with the directions of this Tribunal.

4. In view of what has been recorded hereinabove, present CP stands closed. Notices are discharged. However, the petitioner is at liberty to agitate his grievances, if any remain pending, before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

(Rajveer Singh Verma) (Dr. Chhabilendra Roul)

Member (J)

Member (A)

/daya/

2026.11.05 16:16:06+05'30' DAYAWATI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead