Central Administrative Tribunal
RAJENDER vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (GNCTD) on 28 October 2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench, New Delhi
O.A. No. 3662/2026
This the 28th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
SH . RAJENDER, AGED S/O LATE SH. SANU
R/O HOUSE NO . B-194, YEARS, SANGAM PARK, RANA
PARTAP BAGH, DELHI-110007.
PRESENTLY WORKING AS R.S.K . /SWEEPER IN WARD
NO.68, KESHAVPURAM ZONE, MCD ,
DELHI . BMID NO . 71119296
... Applicant
(By Advocate: None)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER 4th FLOOR, CIVIC CENTER, MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MCD DEMS/KESHAVPURAM ZONE, A- 1 , BLOCK, KESHAVPURAM, DELHI-110035 . ... Respondents (By Advocate: Ms. Punam Singh, Ms. Varika Singh)
DEEKSHA DHINGRA
O R D E R (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
1. In the present Original Application, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “a) give directions to the respondents to change and convert the applicant's N.P.S. to G.P.F. i.e. Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules 1 972 in place of National Pension System, as per the order of the Commissioner of MCD dated 25 . 03.2025 vide No . 146/ Com/MCD/2025 and Circular No . Dir. (P) CED/ MCD/SOII/2024 - 25/5548 dated 11.12 . 2024 and Circular No.Dir(P)CED/MCD/SO-II/2024- 25/5238 dated 21.11.2024 issued by the MCD and benefits of the same may kindly be prov ided to the applicant ; (b) pass any other order/direction which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in view of the above facts and circumstances in favour of the applicant .”
2. None appeared for the applicant even in the revised call.
3. It is seen that the representations of the applicant are still pending consideration before the respondents.
4. Issue notice. Ms. Punam Singh, learned counsel appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsels for the respondents seek some time to obtain appropriate instructions.
DEEKSHA DHINGRA
5. In view of above, without entering into the merits of the case, the present O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representations of the applicant dated 27.05.2025 and 10.07.2025 by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, without going into the merits, at the admission stage itself. No order as to costs.
(Manish Garg) Member (J)
/dd /
DEEKSHA DHINGRA