Central Administrative Tribunal
Deependra Shekhar vs M/O LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT on 28 October 2026
O.A. No. 2913/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench, New Delhi
O.A. No. 2913/2026
M.A. No. 3714/2026
This the 28th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Deependra Shekhar, Age 41 years S/o Shri Mohan Lal, Bapu Colony, Ganesh Pura Kota Jn., Kota Rajasthan
2. Arjun Singh, Age 57 years S/o Late Shri Karmal Singh R/o A- 36, Block A; Kanti Nagal, East Krishna Nagar, Delhi 110095 ... Applicants (By Advocate: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Mahur and Mr. Harkesh Parashar)
Versus
1. Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Labour & Employment, Shram Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi.
2. Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) (Through its Director General) Panchdeep Bhawan, CIG Marg New Delhi 110002
3. Medical Superintendent, IG ESIC Jhilmil, Delhi 110095
4. Medical Officer Incharge (IMO) IG ESIC Jhilmil, Delhi 110095. ... Respondents (By Advocate: Mr. Ankit Gupta)
DEEKSHA DHINGRA
O.A. No. 2913/2026
O R D E R (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
M.A. No.3714/2026
1. The present M.A. is filed seeking permission of joining together in a single application.
2. For the reasons stated therein, the M.A. is allowed. O.A. No. 2913/2026
1. In the present Original Application, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “i) Direct the respondents to decide the pending representation dated 19.05 .2026 and 29.05 .2026 submitted by Applicant No. 1 and Applicant No.2 respectively by passing a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner
ii) Direct the Respondents to extend the benefit of various Judgments in favor of the similarly placed employees for the same travel period with similar method and as a consequence return the recovered amount with interest to the applicants as applicable iii)Quash and set aside the impugned Order dated 11/15.01.2021, passed by the Respondent vide which the Applicants have been subjected to Recovery of the Entire LTC amount with Interest annexed as Annexure A-1 Colly which is as follows: a) Recovery Order vide U.O. No. DM (H) JMA-25(12)12009 CASH 213 Dtd. 11/15.01.2021 issued to Applicant No.1 b) Recovery Order vide U.O. No.DM (H) JMA- 25(12)12009 CASH 203 Dtd 11/15.01.2021 issued to Applicant No.2
iv) Cost of the proceedings may also be awarded to applicants;
v) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Tribunal may also be passed in favour of the applicant”
DEEKSHA DHINGRA
O.A. No. 2913/2026
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that representations attached at Annexure A-2 (Colly)(dated 19.05.2026 and 29.05.2026) are still pending consideration before the respondents. He further submits that the applicants would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to dispose of the aforesaid representations by way of a reasoned and speaking order within a prescribed time frame.
3. In view of above, without entering into the merits of the case, the present O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representations of the applicants dated 19.05.2026 and 29.05.2026 (Annexure A2 Colly) by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
4. The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, without going into the merits, at the admission stage itself. No order as to costs. (Manish Garg) Member (J)
/dd /
DEEKSHA DHINGRA