Central Administrative Tribunal

Chintan Raghuvanshi vs REVENUE on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH

61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001

Order Sheet

Item no.: 20

O.A./1489/2026 (DELHI)

[ SUSPENSION ]

Court No.: 2

No of Adjournment: 5

Order Dated: 03/11/2026

CHINTAN RAGHUVANSHI

Vs

REVENUE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. T R Mohanty For Respondent(s) Advocate : Ms. Ringh Baliyan for Mr. Gyanendra Singh Order of The Tribunal

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, in the facts and circumstances of the case, no rejoinder is required.

2. Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the applicant, presses for disposal of the OA. He submits that the issue involved is only an increase of subsistence allowance and the matter is not likely to take much time. However, at the request of the learned proxy counsel for the respondents, list the matter for consideration and disposal under the same category on 18.11.2026. Rajinder Kashyap Member (A) R. N. Singh Member (J) Kshitij Saxena ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead