Central Administrative Tribunal

Gajendera Dubey vs GOVT. OF NCTD on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 29 M.A./791/2026 (DELHI) [ EXECUTION ] In O.A./408/2019 DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING MODIFICATION OF ORDER Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 7 Order Dated: 02/11/2026 GAJENDERA DUBEY Vs GOVT. OF NCTD

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Alankriti Dwivedi For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Amit Anand, Mr. N K Singh, Dy. Director of Edu, Zone-29 Order of The Tribunal MA No. 791/2026 (Execution) The order dated 16.10.2026 in the matter reads as under: "1. By way of the present MA, the applicant seeks execution of directions of the Tribunal contained in order dated 24.01.2025 in the captioned OA.

2. Para 6 of the aforesaid order dated 24.01.2025 reads as under: "6. Accordingly, the OA is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to consider and pass appropriate order(s) with regard to grant of benefits to the applicant under ACP/MACP scheme as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order."

3. Despite opportunities, no reply/compliance affidavit has been filed by the respondents. At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, respondents were accorded further two weeks' time as a last opportunity to file an affidavit indicating compliance of directions of this Tribunal vide order dated 29.09.2026.

4. Today, Sh. Amit Anand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the relevant file is stated to be pending consideration of the Chief Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi. He, accordingly, seeks further two weeks' time in order to enable the respondents to file an affidavit indicating compliance of directions of this Tribunal.

5. Request on behalf of the respondents is vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the applicant. However, in the interest of justice, respondents are accorded further two weeks' time file an affidavit indicating compliance of directions of this Tribunal, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 5,500/- payable to the applicant.

6. Re-notify on 02.11.2026.

7. At the request of Sh. Amit Anand, learned counsel for the respondents, order dasti. "

2. Despite the aforesaid, compliance of the directions of the Tribunal is still awaited.

3. Mr. Anand, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that the relevant file is still lying pending consideration of the Chief Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi. He, under instructions, seeks and is allowed further four weeks' time to file an affidavit indicating full compliance of the directions of the Tribunal, subject to payment of additional cost of Rs.11,000/- payable to the applicant.

4. Re-notify on 07.12.2026. Rajinder Kashyap Member (A) R. N. Singh Member (J) Kshitij Saxena ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead