Central Administrative Tribunal
Ram Pal vs DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION, GOVT. OF NCTD on 30 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH
61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001
Order Sheet
Item no.: 24
M.A./1005/2026 (DELHI)
[ EXECUTION ]
In
O.A./806/2018
TERMINATION
Court No.: 2
No of Adjournment: 6
Order Dated: 30/10/2026
RAM PAL
Vs
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION, GOVT. OF NCTD
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Shivam Bajaj For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Umesh Joshi Order of The Tribunal MA No. 1005/2026 (Execution)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present MA has been filed seeking execution of the directions of the Tribunal contained in the Tribunal's order dated 14.11.2025.
2. Notice was ordered in the MA on 27.02.2026, when the same was accepted by the respondents through their learned counsel.
3. Matter was thereafter listed on 15.04.2026, 02.07.2026, further on 20.07.2026 and lastly on 01.10.2026.
4. Fact remains that the directions of the Tribunal have not been complied.
5. Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents on 27.10.2026. However, the same is not in record. Further, he does not dispute that the directions of the Tribunal have not been complied. At this stage, he submits that though the Hon'ble High Court in the relevant Writ Petition has rejected the department's prayer for grant of stay of the Tribunal's order dated 14.11.2025, however, the Writ Petition is still pending.
6. We fail to understand that once stay has been rejected by the Hon'ble High Court, what has prevented the respondents from implementing the directions of the Tribunal, of course subject to the outcome of the Writ Petition.
7. Be that as it may, at the request of the learned counsel for the respondents, the respondents are granted further two weeks' time to file an affidavit indicating compliance of the directions of the Tribunal, of course subject to the final outcome of the Writ Petition.
8. It is made clear that in case compliance is not reported by the respondents by way of an affidavit within two weeks, a cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the applicant shall be imposed on the next date of hearing.
9. Re-notify on 19.11.2026.
10. At the request of the learned counsel for the respondents, order dasti. Sanjeeva Kumar Member (A) R. N. Singh Member (J) Kshitij Saxena ( court master )