Central Administrative Tribunal
SUNIL KUMAR TAYAL vs Sh. N Saravana Kumar, Vice Chairman, DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DELHI and anr on 30 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 29 C.P./693/2026 (DELHI) [ CONTEMPT PETITION ] In O.A./3639/2016 MACP Court No.: 5 No of Adjournment: 2 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 SUNIL KUMAR TAYAL Vs SH. N SARAVANA KUMAR, VICE CHAIRMAN, DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DELHI AND ANR
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr Anil Mittal For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr Arun Birbal with Mr Sanjay Singh Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for the respondents states that a letter has been addressed to the PWD seeking compliance with the order passed in O.A. No. 3639/2016. However, the requisite details have not yet been received from the concerned department. There is no appearance on behalf of the PWD, i.e., respondent No. 2 in the present contempt petition. Further, from the record, it is not clear whether notice has been served upon respondent No. 2. In view of the above, let a fresh notice be issued to respondent No.
2. Returnable on 12.01.2027. Shri Rajveer Singh Verma Member (J) Chhabilendra Roul Member (A) Pinky Yadav ( steno 'c' )