Central Administrative Tribunal

DEVENDER SINGH vs DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (DPAR) on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 44 M.A./5099/2026 (DELHI) [ AMENDMENT IN MEMO OF PARTIES ] In Diary No.: 10596/2026 MACP M.A./5102/2026 MA Joining Together Court No.: 5 No of Adjournment: 2 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 DEVENDER SINGH Vs DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (DPAR)

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Annu Mehta For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. N. D.Kaushik Order of The Tribunal MA vide diary No. 11914/2026 Learned counsel for applicant submits that she does not wish to press the present MA. Accordingly, the MA stands dismissed as not pressed. MA vide diary No. 11915/2026 Present MA has been filed by the applicant to include Director General, ASI as necessary party. Learned counsel for applicant submits that inadvertently, the said respondent was not included as necessary party in the OA. In view of above, the MA is allowed. Let amended memo of parties be filed by the applicant in the OA filed vide diary No. 10596/2026. OA vide diary No. 10596/2026 When taken up, regarding admissibility the following issues were raised:-

(i) The registry has raised objection for the some of the applicants have given representation on 10.05.2026 and six months has not elapsed.

(ii) Learned counsel for the respondents, Mr. N.D. Kaushik, who appears on advance notice, submits that some of the applicants are residing in Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Madhya Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. In view of the aforesaid, he submits that the competent authority is the Regional Authority of India, i.e. Respondent No. 3, as per the amended memo of parties. He further submits that no application in this regard has been filed by the applicants.

(iii) In addition, learned counsel for respondents submits that some applicants have been retired and some applicants are still in service. In view of this, joining together may not be allowed. Learned counsel for applicant seeks and is allowed a week’s time to address the issues raised above. Learned counsel for respondents submits that he has not received copy of the OA. Learned counsel for applicant undertakes to supply a copy of OA positively within three working days to learned counsel for respondents. Re-list on 18.11.2026. Shri Rajveer Singh Verma Member (J) Chhabilendra Roul Member (A) Dayawati ( steno 'c' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead