Central Administrative Tribunal
Krishan Kumar vs SMT MANISHA BANSAL BADAL AND OTHERS on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH Order Sheet Item no.: 4 C.P./231/2026 (CHANDIGARH) In O.A./686/2025 REGULARISATION Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 03/11/2026 KRISHAN KUMAR Vs SMT MANISHA BANSAL BADAL AND OTHERS
For Applicant(s) Advocate : SH. K. VINAY PROXY FOR SH. ROHIT SETH
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The instant contempt petition is preferred by the petitioner against the respondents alleging wilful and intentional disobedience of the order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Tribunal in O.A No. 686/2025. The order of this Tribunal was challenged by the respondents before the Hon'ble High Court vide CWP No. 28337/2026, whereby, the Hon'ble High Court has dismissed the writ petition preferred by the Union of India. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the material available on record. There are reasonable grounds to issue notice to the respondents.
Let notice be issued to the respondents returnable within eight weeks. List the matter on 18.12.2026.
Rashmi Saxena Sahni Member (A) Suresh Kumar Batra Member (J) Mandeep Singh ( steno 'd' )