Central Administrative Tribunal
RAJA PANKAJ vs SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY on 4 November 2026
OA 371/2025
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH
CIRCUIT SITTING AT RANCHI
O.A. No. 051/00371/2025
Date of order :- 04.11.2026
C O R A M
HON’BLE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER [A]
Raja Pankaj,
Aged about 49 years, Son of Late Mohan Sinha, now holding the post of Chief Office Superintendent in Area Manager Office.
Tata Nagar, PO & PS Parsudih, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand), Pin- 831002.
.………Applicant
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India, through General Manager, South Eastern Railway, PO & PS Garden Reach, Kolkata- 700043.
2. The Principal Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, PO & PS Garden Reach, Kolkata- 700073.
3. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Chakradharpur Division, PO & PS- Chakradharpur, District- West Singhbhum, Pin- 833102.
4. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Chakradharpur Division, South Eastern Railway, PO & PS- Chakradharpur, District West Singhbhum, Pin- 833102.
5. Senior Divisional Operation Manager (Co-ord). South Eastern Railway, Chakradharpur Division, PO & PS Chakradharpur, District West Singhbhum, Pin- 833102 (Jharkhand).
……..Respondents
For Applicant:-
Mrs. Mahua Palit, V/c mode For Respondents:-
Mr. Rajendra Krishna, CGSC Digitally signed by Sonali Lal Sonali Lal
OA 371/2025
ORDER (ORAL)
PER:- MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER[A]
The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief: “A. For quashing the order dated 11.04.2025 issued by the respondent no. 4 as contained in Annexure-A/5. Application whereby and whereunder the applicant has been ordered to be redeployed from the post Chief Office Superintendent, Ministry cadre to the post of Chief Controller operating department in control cadre, Chakradharpur in Safety category post being illegal, null and void and against the Principle of Promissory Stopped. B. To hold and declare the order dated 24.09.2019 as contained in Annexure-5 aborting the petitioner to the post Chief Office Superintendent (Official Group) Ministry Cadre ,i.e., the alternative post being medically decategorised is legal proper, valid and no interference/ modification/ redployment is required thereafter. C. To grant all consequential benefits in favour of the petitioner. D. And for any other relief/s for which the petitioner is entitled in law.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant, appearing through video conferencing, fairly submits that she has received instructions from the applicant to withdraw the instant Original Application, as the applicant is no longer desirous of pursuing the matter further.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the applicant.
5. In view of the above, the prayer for withdrawal is allowed. Accordingly, the OA stands disposed of as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra)
Member (A)
/sonali/ Digitally signed by Sonali Lal Sonali Lal