Central Administrative Tribunal

PUNIT CHOUDHARY vs Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU Order Sheet Item no.: 14 O.A./419/2026 (JAMMU) [ TRANSFER ] Along With O.A./658/2026 ALLOWANCES Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 6 Order Dated: 05/11/2026 PUNIT CHOUDHARY Vs SHER-E-KASHMIR UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY OF JAMMU

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Vivek Jamwal vice Mr. Dhruv Pant For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Anil Khajuria with Mr.Abhimanyu Sadotra, Ms. Himani Khajuria Order of The Tribunal In OA No. 419 of 2026 Respondents were granted fourth and last opportunity to file reply vide order dated 04.08.2026, and subsequently, vide order dated 02.09.2026, respondents were directed to supply details of all such pending OAs by the next date of hearing in which respondents have to take a policy decision, and are required to be clubbed together. The list has still not been supplied by the respondents. It is also noticed that despite of fourth and last opportunity they have not filed reply. One final opportunity is hereby granted to the respondents to file reply, failing which cost of Rs. 10,000/- would be imposed upon the respondents. List the matter on 27.10.2027.

In OA No. 658 of 2026 Vide order dated 08.09.2026, a notice was issued in the miscellaneous application no. 1306 of 2026 moved by one Narinder Paul aged 50 years, S/o Sh. Janak Raj, R/o Ward No. 2, Kathua, Opposite Nagri Bus Adda, Kathua, J&K, for impleadment as respondent in OA No. 658 of 2026, and no response has been filed either by the applicant or the respondents. Considering the nature of the grievance and contents of the application, the same is allowed. Applicant is impleaded as respondent, as prayed for. Accordingly, Registry is directed to reflect the name of the applicant in the array of parties. List the matter on 27.01.2027, alongwith OA No. 419 of 2026. Diwakar Singh Member (J) Ram Mohan Johri Member (A) Rajat Pathania ( )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead