Central Administrative Tribunal
MOHD IQBAL vs EDUCATION on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU Order Sheet Item no.: 53 T.A./203/2026 (JAMMU) [ DISENGAGE THE SERVICE ] SWP 1667/2018 Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 3 Order Dated: 04/11/2026 MOHD IQBAL Vs EDUCATION
For Applicant(s) Advocate : None
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned AAG Order of The Tribunal (THROUGH HYBRID MODE) Case called out twice. Despite registered notice sent to the applicant through speed post on 03.09.2026, there is no representation on his behalf today. The statutory time period of deemed service has also expired. Even otherwise, on the last two dates of hearing i.e. 08.10.2026 and 24.07.2026, nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the applicant, meaning thereby that the applicant has lost interest in pursing the matter further. Accordingly, the Transferred Application is dismissed in default for non prosecution. No order so as to costs. Interim order, if any granted earlier, shall stand vacated. Pragya Sahay Saksena Member (A) Sanjeev Gupta Member (J) Pooja Soni ( court master )