Central Administrative Tribunal
Dr Rayees Ul Hamid Wani vs HEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT on 5 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SRINAGAR Order Sheet Item no.: 6 O.A./1253/2026 (SRINAGAR) [ NOC ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 05/11/2026 DR RAYEES UL HAMID WANI Vs HEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
For Applicant(s) Advocate : MR. MUDASIR BIN HASSAN
For Respondent(s) Advocate : MR. SYED MUSAIB, DAG FOR 1 AND 2, NONE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.3 Order of The Tribunal Hon’ble Member (J) has joined the proceedings through virtual mode. Heard in O.A./1253/2026. Issue notice. Mr. Syed Musaib, learned DAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and seeks time to file the reply, be filed on or before the next date of hearing, with an advance copy to the other side. None has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 3, either in person or through virtual mode. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to take necessary steps for service upon respondent No. 3 by filing RC/AD covers before the Registry within two days.
Having regard to the fact that the applicant is stated to have submitted his request for issuance of an NOC as far back as 08.06.2026, which has allegedly not been considered by the respondents till date, the respondents shall consider the said request before the scheduled date of interview, i.e., 15.11.2026. List this matter on 04.02.2027 for filing of the reply. Meanwhile, whatever decision is taken by respondent No.1 & 2 in the instant case, a copy thereof shall be immediately transmitted to respondent No. 3 for further necessary action. In the event the request is not considered by the respondents before the scheduled date of interview, respondent No. 3 shall provisionally permit the applicant to participate in the interview scheduled for 15.11.2026. Such participation shall remain subject to the outcome of the present O.A. and shall not, by itself, confer any right upon the applicant. The Registry is directed to reflect the name of the learned counsel for respondent No. 3 in the cause title. The Registry is also directed to send a copy of this order to respondent No. 3.
Prasant Kumar Member (A) Justice Ritu Tagore Member (J) Shubham Sharma ( steno 'd' )