Central Administrative Tribunal
Ravi kant prasad vs REVENUE on 22 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
JABALPUR BENCH
JABALPUR
Original Application No.200/00998/2026
Jabalpur, this Thursday, the 22nd day of October, 2026
HON’BLE SMT MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Ravi Kant Prasad, S/o Shri Dinesh Prasad, Aged about 53 years, Occupation: District Opium Officer, Jaora 2nd Division, Ratlam, R/o Rangbari Yojna, 4-L-31, Anandpura, Phoota Talab, Kota (M.P.) 324005
-Applicant
(By Advocate – Ms. Kaushiki Sharma)
V e r s u s
1. Union of India, through its Revenue Secretary, Govt. of India Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi 110001
2. The Narcotics Commissioner, Central Bureau of Narcotics, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, 19 Mall Road, Morar, Gwalior 474006
(M.P.)
3. The Assistant Narcotics Commissioner, Central Bureau of Narcotics, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, 19 Mall Road, Morar, Gwalior 474006 (M.P.)
- Respondents
(By Advocate – Shri S P Singh)
VISHAL
KUSHWAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
By Mallika Arya, AM: Through this Original Application, the applicant is challenging the order dated 03.09.2026 (Annexure A/1) wherein the benefit of grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- has been denied to him.
2. The counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had filed representation dated 01.07.2026 (Annexure A/11) for grant of benefit of Rs. 5400/- Grade Pay after completion of 4 years regular service in Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/- but the same has been rejected by the respondents vide order dated 03.09.2026 (Annexure A/1) on the ground that since the applicant has not filed O.A. before this Tribunal, therefore, his case cannot be considered in light of judicial orders. He submits that the applicant will be satisfied if the respondents be directed to decide his case in light of order passed by this Tribunal in O.A./200/24/2025 and other connected matters (Annexure A/7) in a time bound manner.
3. The counsel for the respondents has no objection if this Original Application is disposed of in above terms.
4. Accordingly, this Original Application is disposed at the admission stage with direction to the respondents to decide the case of the applicant by considering this O.A. as representation, in light of the earlier
VISHAL KUSHWAH
orders passed by this Tribunal (Annexure A/7) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
5. The applicant is directed to provide a copy of the order of this Tribunal along with the copy of Original Application to the competent authority.
(MallikaArya)
Administrative Member VK/-
VISHAL KUSHWAH