Central Administrative Tribunal

VIDYA MANOHAR ATHAVALE vs RAILWAY BOARD on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 5 O.A./170/2026 (MUMBAI) [ FAMILY PENSION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 6 Order Dated: 04/11/2026 VIDYA MANOHAR ATHAVALE Vs RAILWAY BOARD

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri Mitesh G. Parmar For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Akash A. Kotecha Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to comply earlier order dated 13.10.2026 and also seeking time to file rejoinder.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently objected to the prayer of the applicant in respect of filing of the rejoinder.

3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submission, three weeks further time is granted to the applicant to carry out amendment as well as for filing rejoinder.

4. List the matter on 18th December, 2026.

MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH Member (J) Ma Alphanso ( )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead