Central Administrative Tribunal
ATUL VASUDEO ADKANE vs REVENUE on 30 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 8 M.A./716/2026 (NAGPUR) [ CONDONATION OF DELAY ] In Diary No.: 1542/2026 PAY SCALES M.A./717/2026 JOINT PETITION Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 ATUL VASUDEO ADKANE Vs REVENUE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Rahul Dhande For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. B.D. Pandit Order of The Tribunal M.A. 716/2026 We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is challenging the pay fixation. It is settled principle of law that pay fixation is a continuous cause of action and, therefore, there is no delay. Learned counsel for the respondents strongly objects to the condonation of the delay.
3. In view of the above, application for condonation of delay is allowed. Delay is condoned. MA 716/2026 stands disposed of. Application be registered if it is, otherwise fit for registeration.
4. Stand over to November 2026, Circuit Bench Sitting at Nagpur.
Sangam Narain Srivastava Member (A) Justice M.G.Sewlikar Member (J) Nicky Kumari ( )