Central Administrative Tribunal
ASHIT KUMAR CHAUDHARY vs RAILWAY on 4 November 2026
O.A./700/2024
(Open Court)
Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Original Application No.700 of 2024
This the 04
th Day of November, 2026.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
Ashit Kumar Chaudhary, aged about 69 years, S/o K.L. Chaudhary, Resident of 108/99 New Basti/Kyedganj, District Allahabad/Prayagraj.
………..Applicant
By Advocate: Shri Vinod Kumar
Versus
1.
Union of India through General Manager North Central Railway Subedarganj, Allahabad.
2.
Senior Divisional Finance Manager, North Central Railway Allahabad.
3.
Head Office Central Pension Processing Cell (CPPC) 1st Floor, 21
Bank House, Rajendra Palace, New Delhi-110008.
4.
The Bank Manager Punjab & Sind Bank, Branch Arya Kanya Degree College, Prayagraj/Allahabad.
5.
The Manager Punjab and Sind Bank Jwala Heri CPPC, A-25
Community Center, Pashim Vihar, New Delhi-110063.
…Respondents
By Advocate: Smt. Shikha Dixit
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, and Smt. Shikha Dixit, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the O.A. has become infructuous as the grievance of the applicant has been redressed by the department. Learned counsel for the respondents did not dispute this fact.
MADHU KUMARI
O.A./700/2024
3. I have considered the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record.
4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, as the grievance of the applicant has already been redressed, the present Original Application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. All associated M.As. also stand disposed of. No costs.
( Justice Om Prakash VII) Member (J)
Madhu
MADHU KUMARI