Central Administrative Tribunal
Smt saroj Yadav vs REVENUE on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD Order Sheet Item no.: 4 O.A./1253/2026 (ALLAHABAD) [ CASUAL LABOUR ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 04/11/2026 SMT SAROJ YADAV Vs REVENUE
For Applicant(s) Advocate :
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Order of The Tribunal Shri Sharad Tandon, learned counsel for the applicant, and Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard. Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, Advocate, states that this case has been allotted to him on behalf of the respondents, therefore, his name may be printed in the cause list in place of Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan. Office is directed to print the name of Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey as counsel for the respondents in the future cause lists deleting the name of Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the O.A. filed by the applicant before the Principal Bench of this Tribunal for regularisation has been finally decided. Thus, requested for time to bring on record the order passed in the said O.A.
List this matter on 17.11.2026. Justice Om Prakash VII Member (J) Madhu Kumari ( steno 'c' )