Central Administrative Tribunal
Mahendra Singh vs REVENUE on 4 November 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LUCKNOW BENCH
Original Application No. 332/00689/2026
[Diary No. 4084/2026]
This, the 04th day of November, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J), HON’BLE MR. PANKAJ KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
1. Mahendra Singh, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Sri Amar Singh, R/o MP 2425 Sri Ram Colony, Haidergarh Road Barabanki 225001, U.P.
2. Manoj Kumar Tripathi, aged about 53 years, S/o Sri Suresh Narayan Tripathi, R/o 214 Eldeco Saksham, Eldeco Udya-11, Lucknow 226025.
3. Pradeep Kumar, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Sri R.D.
Vishwakarma, R/o 1/143 Sector H, Jankipuram, Lucknow.
4. Rakesh Kumar Pandey, aged about 57 years, S/o Late V.N.
Pandey, R/o 197 Nehru Enclave, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow
226010.
5. S.S. Haider, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Sh. Syed Mohd.
Baqar Rizvi, R/o 405 Rohit Tower, Sector-2 Vikas Nagar, Lucknow 226022 (U.P.)
6. Navin Kumar Srivastava, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Sri M.B. Lal, R/o Flat No. 201 R.S. Galaxy Apartment, 2/617 Vikas Nagar, Lucknow 226022 (U.P.)
7. Praveen Kumar Misra, aged about 51 years, S/o late Sri Raj Narain Misra, R/o 104 Rohit Tower, Sector-2 Vikas Nagar, Lucknow 226022 (U.P.)
8. Abhishake Chatterji, aged about 48 years, S/o Late Sri Dev Kumar Chatterji, R/o 102 A-4 Tower Rishita Manhattan, Behind Police Headquarters, Gomti Nagar Extension, Lucknow 226010.
9. Meraj Fatma, aged about 54 years, S/o Sri Buniyad Hussain, R/o 447/459/001, Loadhpurwa, Mallahi Tola, Thakurganj, Lucknow-226003 (U.P.)
..Applicants
By Advocate: Shri Dharmendra Awasthi
VERSUS
1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India, New Delhi.
2. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs through its Chairman, Government of India, New Delhi.
3. The Principal Chief Commissioner (Cadre Controlling Authority) Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Lucknow zone, 7-A Ashok Marg, Lucknow, U.P.
4. The Principal Commissioner CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate Lucknow
5. Additional Commissioner (CCA). Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Lucknow.
6. Commissioner Customs (P) Commissionate, 7th Floor Apartyaksh Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
7. PAO, Customs, CGST & CX, Commissionate, Apartyaksh Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
…..Respondents
By Advocate: Ms. Prayagmati Gupta
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
PER HON’BLE JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J) Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Through this Original Application, applicants have prayed for the following relief (s):
“(a) to issue order/direction commanding the respondents to accord the benefit of MACP and NFSG to the applicants by fixing their pay after taking into account the period of notional promotion to the post of Inspector w.e.f. 06.12.2002 and not granting the benefit of NFSG w.e.f. 06.12.2012 the Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- on completion of four years' service in Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/- and also to pay arrears thereof with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of its due till the date of actual payment by allowing the prayer made therein.
(b) to the issue order/direction commanding respondents to consider and decide the pending representations of the applicants, contained in Annexure no. 13, in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Tribunal.
(c) issue such other order/direction which may be deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(d) allow the Original Application with cost against the respondents in view of the facts and circumstances, legal provisions and Grounds raised in the Application.”
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representations of the applicants attached as Annexure No. 13 [page 116-135 of the paper-book] to this O.A. in the light of judgment passed by Allahabad Bench of this Tribunal in OA No. 1085 of 2018 and O.A. No. 691 of 2023 on 17.05.2024 (Annexure No. 10 to the O.A.), judgment passed Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad Writ-A No. 2491 of 2025 and other connected Writs on 27.11.2025 (Annexure No. 11 to the O.A.), and judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23989- 23991/2026 (Diary No. 33838/2026) on 17.07.2026 (Annexure No. 12 to the OA) by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
4. To this, learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicants’ representations are directed to be decided in the manner suggested, then at least three months’ time may be allowed for the same.
5. In view of the above submission, respondents/ competent authority are directed to consider and decide the representations of the applicants attached as Annexure No. 13 [page 116-135 of the paper-book] to this O.A. in the light of judgment passed by Allahabad Bench of this Tribunal in OA No. 1085 of 2018 and O.A. No. 691 of 2023 on 17.05.2024 (Annexure No. 10 to the O.A.), judgment passed Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad Writ-A No. 2491 of 2025 and other connected Writs on 27.11.2025 (Annexure No. 11 to the O.A.), and judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23989- 23991/2026 (Diary No. 33838/2026) on 17.07.2026 (Annexure No. 12 to the OA) and pass a reasoned and speaking order as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, under intimation forthwith to the applicants.
6. It is made clear that nothing has been commented upon the merits of the case.
7. For avoidance of doubts, it is clarified that similarity of facts and applicability of judgments shall be determined by the competent authority itself while deciding the representation of the applicants.
8. The OA is disposed of accordingly. There is no order as to costs.
(Pankaj Kumar)
(Justice Anil Kumar Ojha) Member (A)
Member (J)
JNS Jay Narayan Singh Digitally signed by Jay Narayan Singh Date: 2026.11.05 12:41:06 +05'30'