Daily order sheet, C2, 15 Oct 2026 on 15 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sachida Nand Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are virtually present.

3. This O.A. has been filed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant on behalf of the applicant against the adverse remarks given by the competent authority in the ACR for the year 2018 and 2019 of the applicant without assigning any reason.

4. There has been delay for more than 04 years, 08 months and 14 days in filing this Original Application. Delay Condonation Application has been filed by the applicant.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed time to file objection against delay condonation application as well as maintainability of the O.A. by next date fixed.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 2)

O.A. No. 1016 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1223 of 2026

Ex Cpl Praveen Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Bipin Kumar Vats, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Bipin Kumar Vats, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Vats, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are virtually present. M.A. No. 1223 of 2026.

2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Original Application. The delay condonation is supported with affidavit. There is delay of 09 years, 09 months and 14 days in filing Original Application.

3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that delay in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of application.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that cause shown for the delay is not sufficient.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that cause shown is sufficient.

7. Accordingly, delay in filing Original Application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1016 of 2026.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was retired from Air Force after completing 9 years and 6 months service and after that joined IDBI Bank and came to know about the Judgment and order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Hon‟ble High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 12208/2023 that similarly situated Ex-Air Force personnel were granted the benefit of pro-rata pension and after making several representations, competent authority has not granted pro-rata pension to the applicant. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents, applicant has filed this O.A. which needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 3)

O.A. No. 1033 of 2026

Amrita Kumari W/o Hav/Clk Brijesh Kumar Yadav Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. From perusal of records it transpires that the applicant has sought direction to the Officer in Charge, Records, The Assam Regiment PIN 900332 C/o 99 APO to decide the representation annexed at Annexure-1 of the original application immediately since the husband of the applicant is going to be retired, shortly.

4. In view of the above, Officer in Charge, Records, The Assam Regiment is hereby directed to decide the representation of the applicant by way of speaking and reasoned order before the discharge of the Hav/Clk Brijesh Kumar Yadav husband of the applicant.

5. The O.A. stands disposed of with the above terms. No costs.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 4)

O.A. No. 1035 of 2026

Smt Nanki alias Nanka Devi Widow of Ex Nk Late Ram Dhan Verma, Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri JN Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

3. Matter pertains to grant of Family pension to the applicant which needs adjudication.

Admit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 5)

EX. A. No. 337 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 169 of 2025

Sgt Sanat Kumar Tripathy (Retd),

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. This fresh execution application has been filed by the applicant for non- implementation of order dated 11.08.2025 passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 169 of 2025.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks‟ time to seek instructions and to file compliance affidavit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that the names of Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Shri Indra Mani Tripathi and Shri Krishan Kumar Singh have not mentioned in the cause list where as the names of the counsel were mentioned in the Vakalatnama.

6. Registry is hereby directed to show the name of all the aforementioned counsel in future date of caused list.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 6)

EX. A. No. 338 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 171 of 2025

Ex Sgt Ram Nand

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Shri Sunil Kumar

Mishra, Shri Indra Mani Tripathi and Shri

Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Sharan Awasthi, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

3. This fresh execution application has been filed by the applicant for non- implementation of order dated 11.08.2025 passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 171 of 2025.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks‟ time to seek instructions and to file compliance affidavit.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 7) M. A. No. 1251 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 756 of 2026

Ex Hav Clk Hom Singh Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Objection against Interim Relief filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Reply to objection against Interim Relief filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. M.A. No. 1251 of 2026.

4. An early hearing application alongwith the affidavit has been filed by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant with a prayer to prepone the date of hearing. The case is already fixed for hearing on 26.10.2026.

5. Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

6. We find no occasion to pre-pone this case. Put up this matter on the date already fixed.

7. M.A No. 1251 of 2026 stands disposed of.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 1) EX-A. No. 111 of 2022 Inre O.A. No. 38 of 2021

Swamy Nath, S/O Late Ex Nk Bagedu Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents are physically present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that corrigendum PPO has already been issued on 13.10.2026 and interest part has been redressed per order of the Tribunal.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents is here by directed to file compliance affidavit. Applicant may file objection, if any, to the compliance affidavit filed by the respondents by the next date fixed.

4. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 2)

EX-A. No. 414 of 2025 Inre O.A. No. 79 of 2018

Smt Raj Kumari (Deceased) through Ashok Kumar & another Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri BB Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the applicant. Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. On perusal of record, it transpires that in pursuance of the Court order dated 03.07.2026, Notice was sent to the respondent No. 4 i.e. Bank and after passing of 30 days, the Registry has not received back served/unserved. Hence, as per rules service of notice is deemed to be held sufficient. Case to be proceeded ex-parte against respondent No. 4.

3. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 3)

EX-A. No. 161 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 309 of 2025

Sgt Rajendra Prasad Ray (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are virtually present.

2. Compliance has not been filed so far.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that no instructions have been received and seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit.

4. In such circumstances, respondents are directed to file compliance affidavit by next date fixed, otherwise, responsible officer shall be required to be present to explain the reasons for delay.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 4)

EX-A. No. 163 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 562 of 2025

NCS(E) Jairam (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance has not been filed so far.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that no instructions have been received and seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit.

4. In such circumstances, respondents are directed to file compliance affidavit by next date fixed, otherwise, responsible officer shall be required to be present to explain the reasons for delay.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents further submits that Registry has mentioned case Wing „Army‟ in the cause list where as the case is pertains to „Air Force‟.

6. Registry is hereby directed to mention case wing „Air Force‟ in place of „Army‟ in future cause list.

7. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 5)

O.A. No. 749 of 2025

Smt Anita Gurung W/o Nk (Late) Chandra Bahadur Gurung Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Shri RK Singh

and Shri DK Dixit, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Mrs. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri V.P. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Mrs. Prerna Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks some more time to file Counter Affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 6)

O.A. No. 884 of 2025

Ramesh Chandra S/o Late Sub (H/L) Purushottam and another Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants: Shri Durgendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Durgendra Kumar Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicants is present before the court and Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. The matter pertains to notional increment, needs adjudication.

3. Admit.

4. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

5. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 7)

O.A. No. 928 of 2025 with M.A. No. 1077 of 2025

Sub Satnarayan (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra and

Shri Onkar Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Time was granted to the learned counsel for applicant to file better affidavit with regard to rent agreement. Now, the ld. Counsel for applicant has filed better affidavit, which is taken on record.

3. So far as delay condonation application is concerned, there is a delay of about 01 year 03 months and 26 days. Cause shown is sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned. M.A.N.1077/2025 stands disposed off.

4. The matter pertains to Notional increment which needs adjudication.

5. Admit.

6. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

7. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 8)

O.A. No. 999 of 2025

Sub Bir Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra and Shri Onkar

Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that Counter Affidavit is ready and copy of the same has been handed over to ld. Counsel for applicant. Counter Reply shall be filed with the registry during the course of day.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant may file Rejoinder Reply within 02 weeks.

4. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 9)

O.A. No. 116 of 2026

Sgt Kashi Prasad Tiwari (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ms. Upasna Mishra, Shri

Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Shri Abhishek pandey, Shri

Yogesh Kumar Mishra and Shri Chandan Kumar

Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present is present through video conferencing. None present for the respondents.

2. Legal representative apprises that Counter Affidavit is ready and the same shall be filed with the registry during the course of day.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to collect the Counter Affidavit.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that he is not inclined to file Rejoinder Reply.

5. List on 16.04.2027 for final physical hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 10)

O.A. No. 223 of 2026 with M.A. No. 287 of 2026

Smt Guddi Devi W/o Late Ex Sep Shish Ram Yadav Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey and Shri Manoj Kumar

Awasthi, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant before the court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Today, this case was listed for filing reply to the objection filed by the respondents on delay condonation application. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks some more time to file reply to the objection filed by respondents on delay condonaiton application. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 11)

O.A. No. 403 of 2026

Sub Maj (RT) Ravindra Kumar Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : HFO Ramesh Chandra Shukla(Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, HFO Ramesh Chandra Shukla(Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that there is delay of more than 20 years but the delay has not been properly explained by the learned counsel for applicant. Applicant in this O.A. is claiming pay fixation from 2006 but the representation in this regard has been filed on 07.03.2026. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that delay is not liable to be condoned.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that applicant was not aware about his grievance at that time and this is a recurring cause of action as it pertains to pensionary benefits of the applicant. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned.

4. Admit.

5. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file Counter Affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

6. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 12)

O.A. No. 503 of 2026

Hav Kishan Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ms. Upasna Mishra

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Shri Chandan

Kumar Pandey, Shri Abhishek Pandey

and Ms. Tanisha Pandey Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that parawise comments is duly received and seeks some more time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No.13)

O.A. No. 504 of 2026

Maj Satish Chandra Bhatt(Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ms. Upasna Mishra

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Shri Chandan

Kumar Pandey, Shri Abhishek Pandey

and Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain, Member (A))

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that parawise comments has not been received and seeks some more time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 14)

O.A. No. 552 of 2026 with M.A. No. 675 of 2026

Ex Sigmn Ghanshyam

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yadav

and Ms. Alka Saksena, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that objection on delay condonation application is ready and the same shall be filed with the registry during the course of day. Copy of objection is duly received by ld. Counsel for the applicant, who may file reply to the objection by the next date.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 15)

T.A. No. 16 of 2026

Hav Sripati Mishra

Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri ….. Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, None appeared on behalf of the applicant. Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. In pursuance of the order dated 29.5.2026 of this Tribunal, notice was sent to the applicant but the notice has been return back unserved with remark “Return to Sender”.

3. On perusal of order of Hon‟ble High Court passed in Writ Petition No. 3438 of 2000 (Hav. Sripati Mishra Vs. Union of India through Chief of the Army Staff), it reflected that the Hon‟ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench had passed the order on 12.03.2010 for transferring the matter to AFT, Lucknow Bench but this T.A. was received in AFT, Lucknow Bench on 15.04.2026. Notice was issued to the applicant on 29.5.2026 but no body has turned up.

4. It appears that applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, T.A. is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.

5. No order as to costs

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 251 of 2023 with M.A. No. 264 of 2023

Ex ACP Nk Manoj Kumar Bhuyan & Ors

Applicants

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Ashok Singh and Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocates

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Deepti P Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicants is present through virtual mode and Ms Deepti P Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present in Court.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. In pursuance of order dated 07.05.2026, Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks time to file appropriate application, which is allowed.

4. List on 18.02.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 17)

O.A. No. 865 of 2023

Mrs Dil Kumari Malla W/o late Hav Dan Bahadur Mall

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Col AK Srivastava (Retd) and Shri Amrendu Srivastava, Advocates

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present. None is present on behalf of the applicant.

2. Today, no one is present on behalf of the applicant, therefore, in the interest of justice the case is adjourned. It is made clear that if none represents on behalf of the applicant on the next date of listing, this O.A. shall be dismissed in default.

3. List on 02.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 18)

O.A. No. 1517 of 2023

Smt Rani Yadava W/o L/Nk Ram Surat Yadav

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani and Mohd Zafar Khan, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 1-3 and Mohd Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 4-5 and 6 are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 4-5 and 6 submits that this O.A. is not maintainable as the payment was made in the year 2021 and the O.A. was filed in the year 2023. He further submits that the pension account was migrated to SPARSH in September, 2023.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that grievances of the applicant have been redressed but interest has not been paid to the applicant. He further submits that Circular No. 570 was issued on 01.01.2016 and according to this circular, the payment has been made but the interest part has not been paid as the amount was actually paid on 18.11.2021. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicant that keeping in view the payment being made in the year 2021 and the Circular being issued in year 2016, the applicant deserves to be granted interest on delayed payment.

5. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the bank is directed to seek clarification in this regard and apprise this Court on or before the next date of listing.

6. List on 08.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 19)

O.A. No. 963 of 2024

Ex Nk Vinay Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. Order reserved.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 20)

O.A. No. 546 of 2025

Ex Hav Sur Sari Charan (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : HFO Ramesh Chandra Shukla (Retd) and Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, HFO Ramesh Chandra Shukla (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. Order reserved.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 21)

O.A. (A) No. 1252 of 2023

Ex Hav Lal Singh (through Pairokar Bheekam Singh, brother)

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant : Shri T Prasad and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Advocates

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri T Prasad and Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the appellant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. In this case, opportunity to file counter affidavit has already been closed vide order dated 23.04.2026.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he will file application for recall of order dated 23.04.2026 by which opportunity to file counter affidavit was closed. He further submits that on recall of order dated 23.04.2026, counter affidavit shall be filed.

5. List on 16.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore