Himachal Pradesh High Court
CR/142/2017 on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:49179 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No.142 of 2017 Date of decision: 06.11.2026 Dalip Singh.
...Petitioner. Versus Ramesh Kumar & Ors.
…Respondents.
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Ritasha Gaur and Ms. Anita Jalota, Advocates, vice Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge
Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner against dismissal of his application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), vide order dated 31.08.2016 passed in CMA No. 11/6 of 2014, and order dated 25.04.2017 passed by District Judge, Sirmaur in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 24-CMA/14 of 2016, whereby appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 31.08.2016 has been dismissed.
2. Today, Ms. Ritasha Gaur, Advocate, under instructions of original counsel Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate, has placed on record original compromise arrived at between the parties, i.e, 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2026 02:57:38 :::CIS
-2-
petitioner-Dilip Singh and respondents-Ramesh Kumar, Heera Lal and Santosh Kumari. The said compromise has been endorsed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The essence of the compromise is that parties have compromised the matter and now the revision petition has not to be pressed by the petitioner.
4. In view of the above, present revision petition is disposed of being not pressed, in terms of compromise dated 26.07.2026 arrived at between the parties, placed on record by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of in above terms.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge 6th November, 2026 (Pardeep)
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2026 02:57:38 :::CIS