Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMP/5022/2026 on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 747 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.11.2026
Sunder Singh
...Petitioner Versus H. P. State Co-Op Agriculture and Rural Development Bank
...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : M/s Gambir Chauhan and Ganesh Barowalia, Advocates.
For the Respondent : Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a receipt dated 05.11.2026, regarding the deposit of ₹9000/-, which is 7.5% of the cheque amount, issued by the Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions, submits that the complainant/respondent does not want to proceed further with the complaint in view of the compromise effected between the parties.
3. In view of above, present revision petition is allowed and the judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 104 of 2024, on 02.02.2026 (learned Appellate Court) affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.10.2024, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. (learned Trial Court) in Criminal Case No. 161 of 2021.are ordered to be set aside and the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no amount has been deposited before the learned Courts below or before this Court, hence, no order is required to be passed regarding the disbursal of the amount.
5. The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody and he is presently lodged in Model Central Jail, Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. He is ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Release warrants be prepared accordingly and the same be sent to the Jail Superintendent, Model Central Jail, Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. and learned Trial Court through FASTER forthwith for necessary compliance.
6. In view of the above, the present revision is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 06.11.2026 (ravinder)
Digitally signed by RAVINDER KUMAR DN: C=IN, O=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=35ecb6f93c6891a7dae90f163e34d7ecaa420b13af1363204ab0e0f5c87077dc, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=f6cc63c55495d14ce1f8623eacdb6cb9ef2c553803537a2f53c4ee637cbebaff, CN=RAVINDER KUMAR Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026-11-06 15:40:35 RAVINDER KUMAR