Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/864/2026 of MEENAMBAKKAM REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA on 6 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 864/2026

$~15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010540862026

+

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 864/2026 & I.A. 30939/2026

MEENAMBAKKAM REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Ms. Akriti

Chaubey, Mr. Zain Maqbool,

Mr. Saif Zia and Mr. Meeran

Maqbool, Advocates.

versus

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Digvijay Rai, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

%

06.11.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal comprising Justice (Retd.) V. Ramasubramanian, Presiding Arbitrator, Justice (Retd.) S. Ravindra Bhat, Nominee Arbitrator and Justice (Retd.) Najmi Waziri, Nominee Arbitrator for a further period of 8 weeks.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the arbitral proceedings have concluded and the matter was reserved for pronouncement of the award vide procedural order dated 28.05.2026. However, vide communication dated 16.10.2026, the office of the learned Presiding Arbitrator has informed that preparation of the Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:06.11.2026 16:50:27 Signature Not Verified

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 864/2026

award would require some more time and therefore, a short extension of the mandate is necessary to enable the learned Tribunal to pronounce the award.

3. Issue notice.

4. Mr. Digvijay Rai, learned Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent and submits that he has no objection to the extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

5. Considering that the arbitral proceedings have already been concluded and in view of the consensus between the parties, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal is extended for a further period of 8 weeks from today. The intervening period, if any, shall also stands regularised.

6. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J NOVEMBER 6, 2026/pa

Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:06.11.2026 16:50:27 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead