Central Administrative Tribunal

Usha Rani vs DSSSB (GNCTD) on 5 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Central Administrative Tribunal

Principal Bench: New Delhi

O.A. No. 4449/2026

This the 05th day of November, 2026

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

Hon’ble Dr. Anand S Khati, Member (A)

Usha Rani Aged about 40 years, D/o Sh. Balwan Singh, R/o House No. 661/26, Badli Road, Gali No. 1, DIG

Colony, Bahadurgarh, Distt. — Jhajjar, Haryana-124507

…Applicant

(By Advocate: Mr. Nikhil Pawar, Mr. Shubham Bahl, Ms. Kritika Matta, Ms. Bhumica Kundra, Ms. Tanya Rose and Mr. Shakib Malik)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) Through its Chairman, Govt. of NCT of Delhi FC-18, Institutional Area Karkardooma, Delhi-110092 Email: dsssb-secy@nic.in

2. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) Through its Commissioner, Hospital Administration Department (HQ), 18th Floor, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002

3. Roll No. 248161201001449 C/o Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) Through its Chairman, Govt. of NCT of Delhi FC-18, Institutional Area Karkardooma, Delhi-110092 Email: dsssb-secy@nic.in

4. Roll No. 248161201004342 C/o Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) Through its Chairman, Govt. of NCT of Delhi FC-18, Institutional Area Karkardooma, Delhi-110092 Email: dsssb-secy@nic.in …Respondents (By Advocates: Mr. Amit Anand for DSSSB;

Mr. Aman Oberoi for R-2)

SNEHA MEENA

ORDER (ORAL)

By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:- “(i) Set aside the Result Notice No. 371 dated 09.09.2026, issued by DSSSB, to the extent it does not nominate the applicant for the post of Auxiliary Nurse/Midwife (Post Code 816/24) in MCD under the PwBD Category-(c);

(ii) Direct the respondent no. 1/DSSSB to provisionally nominate the applicant, having secured 80.03 marks against the cut-off of 62.07 marks, for the post of Auxiliary Nurse/Midwife (Post Code 816/24) in MCD under the PwBD Category-(c), and to forward her e-dossier to the MCD, within such time as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit;

(iii) Direct the respondent no. 2/MCD to verify the documents of the applicant and, upon such verification, to issue the offer of appointment to the applicant for the said post;

(iv) Direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the applicant against unfilled vacancy of the post of Auxiliary Nurse/Midwife under the Post Code 816/24, in accordance with Section 34 of the RPwD Act, 2016;

(v) Direct the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits (monetary as well as non-monetary) to the applicant pursuant to her appointment on the said post, including seniority and pay fixation, with effect from the date on which the candidates nominated vide the Result Notice No. 371 dated 09.09.2026 are appointed;

(vi) allow the present Original Application with costs in favour of the applicant; and

(vii) issue any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and in the favour of the applicant.”

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the legal notice dated 10.10.2026 (Annexure A-2) is still pending consideration before SNEHA MEENA

the respondents. He submits that the said legal notice may be treated as a representation. He further submits that the applicant would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to dispose of the aforesaid representation by way of a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated time frame.

3. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. Aman Oberoi, learned counsel, appear and accept notice on behalf of the respective respondents. They seek some time to obtain appropriate instructions in the matter.

4. In view of the limited prayer made, without entering into the merits of the case, the present O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice/representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

5. A copy of the speaking order so passed shall be provided to the applicant.

6. The O.A. is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, without going into the merits of the case, at the SNEHA MEENA

admission stage itself. Pending M.As., if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly.

7. No order as to costs.

(Dr. Anand S Khati) (Manish Garg) Member (A)

Member (J)

/sm/ SNEHA MEENA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead