Central Administrative Tribunal
RAVINDER KUMAR vs Sh govind mohan secretary HOME AFFAIRS on 5 November 2026
Item No.28/ C-IV
C.P. No.611/2026
IN
O.A. No.1289/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench: New Delhi
C.P. No.611/2026
IN
O.A. No.1289/2026
This the 05th day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Ravinder Kumar,
Aged About 33 Years, Son of Babu Lal,
Resident of Ward No. 10, Farrukh Nagar (Rural), 35, Gurugram, Haryana-122506.
Applicant Constable (Driver) Male In Delhi Police, 2022.
…Applicant/Petitioner
(By Advocate: Mr. Pradeep Tripathi for Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya )
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sh. Govind Mohan, Secretary, Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs, North Block, Govt. Of India New Delhi-110001.
2. Sh. S. Gopalkrishnan, IAS Staff Selections Commission, Through The Chairman, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.
3. Sh. Satish Golchha, IPS, Through Commissioner Of Police, Delhi Police Headquarters, Behind Parliament Street Police Station, New Delhi-110001.
4. Sh. RAJEEV KUMAR AMBASTA, Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Recruitment, Delhi Police Lines, Kingsway Camp, New Delhi-110009.
…Respondents/Alleged Contemnors
(By Advocate: Ms. Neha Bairagee with Ms. Ranjana Sharma)
SNEHA MEENA
Item No.28/ C-IV
C.P. No.611/2026 IN O.A. No.1289/2026
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents places on record the speaking order dated 01.06.2026, stating that the directions passed by this Tribunal have been complied with.
2. A copy of the speaking order has been supplied to the other side. The same is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to avail of appropriate remedies, if so advised, in accordance with law.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present Contempt Petition stands closed and the notices issued therein are discharged. It is, however, made clear that the applicant shall be at liberty to agitate any surviving grievance, if so advised, before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Pending M.A.(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(DR. ANAND S KHATI) (MANISH GARG)
MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J) /sm/ SNEHA MEENA