Central Administrative Tribunal
Shakuntla Bajaj vs GNCTD on 2 November 2026
Item No. 16 (C-I/SB)
O.A. No. 3635/2025
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
O.A. No. 3635/2025
This the 02nd day of November, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. B Anand, Member (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mrs. Shakuntla Bajaj (Retd.) aged 86 years (Ex. Principal, GBSSS , SU Block, Pitampura, Delhi) W/o late Shri R.P. Bajaj- B-213, Saraswati Vihar, Delhi- 110034
2. Mrs. Darshan Arora (Retd) aged 83 years (Ex Principal, Sarvodya Kanya Sr.Sec.School Prashant Vihar, Sector 14 Rohini, Delhi) W/o Late Shri Raj Gopal Anand C-2C/2 House No. 197, Janakpuri, Delhi-110058 … Applicants (By Advocate: Mr. Deepak Verma)
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. through
1. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate New Delhi-110002
2. The Director, Directorate of Education Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Old Secretariat, Delhi-110054
… Respondents
(By Advocate: Mr. Rohit Bhagat for Mr.Saurabh Chadda)
SHILPI GUPTA 2026.11.06 15:57:53+05'30' SHILPI GUPTA
Item No. 16 (C-I/SB)
O.A. No. 3635/2025
O R D E R (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the applicants fairly submits that the matter can be disposed of, inasmuch as the respondents have passed orders dated 4th August, 2026, for refixation of pension, as well as the refixation order dated 31st July, 2026.
2. However, at the request of the learned counsel for the applicant, the respondents are directed to disburse the admissible arrears in terms of the aforesaid orders dated 4th August, 2026 and 31st July, 2026, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant further states that applicant No. 1 has unfortunately expired. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to disburse the pensionary arrears of applicant No. 1 to her legal heirs.
4. In view of the above, the present O.A. is disposed of. Pending M.A(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
[
(B. Anand)
Member (A)
/SG/ SHILPI GUPTA 2026.11.06 15:57:53+05'30' SHILPI GUPTA