Central Administrative Tribunal
PURUSHOTTAM MEENA vs Department of Telecommunication on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 51 O.A./1994/2024 (DELHI) [ RECRUITMENT RULES ] With M.A./1732/2024 MA Joining Together Along With O.A./1331/2024 PROMOTION O.A./4600/2024 PROMOTION O.A./4089/2024 PROMOTION O.A./4091/2024 PROMOTION Court No.: 4 No of Adjournment: 23 Order Dated: 03/11/2026 PURUSHOTTAM MEENA Vs DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Gauri Puri For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. R V Sinha, Ms. Leelawati Suman Order of The Tribunal An affidavit is stated to have been filed on 03.10.2026 on behalf of the respondents, i.e., BSNL. However, the same is not available on record. Let the same be brought on record with an advance copy to the other side. The written synopsis filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents. Liberty is also granted to the learned counsel for the respondents to file their written synopsis by the next date of hearing.
Learned counsel for both parties are directed to ensure that the pleadings and written submissions, as may be necessary, are duly exchanged well in advance, and in any event, at least one week prior to the next date of hearing. List the matter on 02.12.2026 under the category of 'Part Heard' matters.
Dr. Anand S Khati Member (A) Manish Garg Member (J) Suraj Bisht ( steno 'c' )