Central Administrative Tribunal

K Bharat Kumar vs DRDO on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OA.No.843/2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.021/00843/2026

HYDERABAD, this the, 04th Day of November, 2026

HON’BLE MR. MANISH GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

K Bharat Kumar, S/o. K.Chandra Moulieshwar Rao Aged about 31 years, Occ: Scientist/Engineer R/o. Shandar Chowk, Ward No.35

Bhilai Charoda, Durg

Chattisgarh – 490025.

…..Applicant

(By Advocate: Dr.R.Murugaiah)

Vs.

1. Union of India Rep by its Secretary

Department of Space, Antariksh Bhavan

New BEL Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560094.

2. Department of Personnel and Training

Rep. by its Secretary, Kartavya Bhavan-3

New Delhi – 110001.

3. Director, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala – 695022.

4. Director, Naval Science & Technological Laboratory (NSTL)

Vigyan Nagar, Visakhapatnam

Andhra Pradesh – 530027.

….Respondents

******

Digitally signed by PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA

DN: C=IN, CN=PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA, L=Hyderabad, O=Central Administrative Tribunal, OU=Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, ST=Telangana, E=needhee.2@

gmail.com, postalCode=500004, serialNumber=

35e33c0d6e61374d1b11744a97265175a0ceaf8ba7768772f41

813a4eb590082, street=No. 05-10-193, 1st Floor, HACA

Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad, telephoneNumber=

ec4f909cdddc28931061bef733616fb5c65493d179209a8c2cfa a0a510742c22

Reason: I am the author of this document Location:

Date: 2026.11.06 16:52:39+05'30'

Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.3.0

PANDIRLAP

ALLI

SANDHYA

OA.No.843/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

PER: HON’BLE SHRI MANISH GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the applicant wishes to withdraw the present Original Application with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.

2. In view of the above, the Original Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

(Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi) (Manish Garg) Administrative Member

Judicial Member

04.11.2026

/ps/ Digitally signed by PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA DN: C=IN, CN=PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA, L=Hyderabad, O=Central Administrative Tribunal, OU=Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, ST=Telangana, E=needhee.2@ gmail.com, postalCode=500004, serialNumber= 35e33c0d6e61374d1b11744a97265175a0ceaf8ba7768772f41 813a4eb590082, street=No. 05-10-193, 1st Floor, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad, telephoneNumber= ec4f909cdddc28931061bef733616fb5c65493d179209a8c2cfa a0a510742c22 Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.11.06 16:52:39+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.3.0 PANDIRLAP ALLI SANDHYA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead