Central Administrative Tribunal
K Bharat Kumar vs DRDO on 4 November 2026
OA.No.843/2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.021/00843/2026
HYDERABAD, this the, 04th Day of November, 2026
HON’BLE MR. MANISH GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
K Bharat Kumar, S/o. K.Chandra Moulieshwar Rao Aged about 31 years, Occ: Scientist/Engineer R/o. Shandar Chowk, Ward No.35
Bhilai Charoda, Durg
Chattisgarh – 490025.
…..Applicant
(By Advocate: Dr.R.Murugaiah)
Vs.
1. Union of India Rep by its Secretary
Department of Space, Antariksh Bhavan
New BEL Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560094.
2. Department of Personnel and Training
Rep. by its Secretary, Kartavya Bhavan-3
New Delhi – 110001.
3. Director, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala – 695022.
4. Director, Naval Science & Technological Laboratory (NSTL)
Vigyan Nagar, Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh – 530027.
….Respondents
******
Digitally signed by PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA
DN: C=IN, CN=PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA, L=Hyderabad, O=Central Administrative Tribunal, OU=Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, ST=Telangana, E=needhee.2@
gmail.com, postalCode=500004, serialNumber=
35e33c0d6e61374d1b11744a97265175a0ceaf8ba7768772f41
813a4eb590082, street=No. 05-10-193, 1st Floor, HACA
Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad, telephoneNumber=
ec4f909cdddc28931061bef733616fb5c65493d179209a8c2cfa a0a510742c22
Reason: I am the author of this document Location:
Date: 2026.11.06 16:52:39+05'30'
Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.3.0
PANDIRLAP
ALLI
SANDHYA
OA.No.843/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
PER: HON’BLE SHRI MANISH GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the applicant wishes to withdraw the present Original Application with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
2. In view of the above, the Original Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi) (Manish Garg) Administrative Member
Judicial Member
04.11.2026
/ps/ Digitally signed by PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA DN: C=IN, CN=PANDIRLAPALLI SANDHYA, L=Hyderabad, O=Central Administrative Tribunal, OU=Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, ST=Telangana, E=needhee.2@ gmail.com, postalCode=500004, serialNumber= 35e33c0d6e61374d1b11744a97265175a0ceaf8ba7768772f41 813a4eb590082, street=No. 05-10-193, 1st Floor, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad, telephoneNumber= ec4f909cdddc28931061bef733616fb5c65493d179209a8c2cfa a0a510742c22 Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.11.06 16:52:39+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.3.0 PANDIRLAP ALLI SANDHYA