Central Administrative Tribunal

Mahadeo Mahto vs SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY on 6 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 15 O.A./67/2026 (RANCHI) [ PENSION SCHEME ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 4 Order Dated: 06/11/2026 MAHADEO MAHTO Vs SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Jyotsna Mahto For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Ishan Ashish for Nikhil Ranjan Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for both sides are present. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that she has received a copy of written statement recently and she may be given an opportunity to peruse the written statement and file rejoinder, if needed. Rejoinder may be filed within two weeks. It is made clear that the rejoinder, if any, shall be confined only to the new facts mentioned in the written statement or such facts which require specific denial. List this case on 11.12.2026.

KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Suryaroop Kabi ( ps )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead