Central Administrative Tribunal
Tharanga Bose vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION on 6 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 48 O.A./557/2026 (ERNAKULAM) [ RECRUITMENT ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 06/11/2026 THARANGA BOSE Vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Vinay Kumar Varma For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. M.K. Padmanabhan Nair, ACGSC, Mr. Millu Dandapani Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal (TODAY) Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant Sri. Vinay Kumar Varma. He pressed for an order on the lines of the order passed by this Tribunal dated 12.10.2026 in O.A/512/2026. According to him, the applicant has obtained non-creamy layer certificate covering the period, as stipulated in the Notification. The interview is still going on in Noida. Pending consideration of the disputed questions, if the applicant is not permitted to atttend the interview atleast provisionally, untold miseries will cause to her. So he pressed for an interim order. Sri. M.K Padmanabhan Nair, learned ACGSC representing respondent nos. 1 and 3 has raised a preliminary objection challenging the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. He says that in Annexure A1 notification clause 24 (q) states that ' Any dispute with regard to this recruitment shall be subject to the court having its jurisdiction in Delhi only'. He has also submitted that this question was not raised or considered by this Tribunal when an interim order was passed in O.A/512/2026 on 12.10.2026. He also made available a full text of Annexure A1 for our perusal. Learned Counsel representing Advocate. Sri. Millu Dandapani for the second respondent has also raised similar contentions. He has submitted that they are proposing to move the Tribunal for vacating the interim order in O.A/512/2026 etc. He also pointed out that the order of the Principal Bench in O.A/3789/2026 has already been called in question before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and has obtained an order of stay. Adjourned to 12.11.2026 for considering the preliminary objection. BRAJ MOHAN AGRAWAL MEMBER (A) JUSTICE K HARIPAL MEMBER (J) Sandra M ( )
Case No O.A./557/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 48 Generated by SANDRA CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 06/11/2026
2026.11.06 16:55:17+05'30' 2024.3.0 A X Sherin