Central Administrative Tribunal
SANJAY GOVIND GURAV vs M/O FINANCE on 5 November 2026
1 CP No.47/2026 in
OA No.147/2019
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI
CONTEMPT PETITION No.47/2026
in
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.147/2019
Date of Decision: 05th November, 2026
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. SHRI KRISHNA, MEMBER (A)
HON’BLE MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH, MEMBER (J)
Sanjay Govind Gurav
Aged 56 yrs., Occ.:Nil,
R/o. T/37, Room No.204, Camp No.3,
Pratiksha Nagar, Sion Koliwada, Sion (E), Mumbai - 400 022
Mob No.:07900144437
Email ID:sanjayggurav1969@gmail.com ... Petitioner ( By Advocate Shri A.V. Shinde )
Versus
1. Smt Malati Shreedharan
Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, 3rd Fl., Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020.
2. Shri Ankush Kapoor
Commissioner of Income Tax (Admn & TPS), Room No.324, 3rd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020.
… Respondents/
Contemnors
( None )
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Per : Shri Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Learned counsel for the Contempt Petitioner fairly submits that in terms of g y g y p DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=1625, OID.2.5.4.65= 399aa54d40324576850c692c7a861e1e, Phone= 30f7d919c844ed7f75e7bc56633df96108338768adae5582338f0d13d4f0f1dc, PostalCode=401203, S=Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER= 6b7c9269fe100118bd94c76380691e4802b189a40578bdd0fd757c8b8babf6f4, CN= Milan Jackson Alphanso Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.11.06 14:27:16+05'30' Milan Jackson Alphanso
2 CP No.47/2026 in OA No.147/2019 direction issued by this Tribunal in OA No.147/2019 dated 04.12.2024, the respondents have passed an order and rejected the claim of the petitioner, after reconsidering the case and, therefore, the Contempt Petitioner will take an appropriate steps in that regard and, therefore, nothing survives in the Contempt Petition.
2. Taking into note of the submission of the learned counsel for the Contempt Petitioner, the Contempt Petition stands dismissed. Notices are discharged.
(Umesh Gajankush)
(Shri Krishna) Member (J)
Member (A)
ma* g y g y p DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=1625, OID.2.5.4.65= 399aa54d40324576850c692c7a861e1e, Phone= 30f7d919c844ed7f75e7bc56633df96108338768adae5582338f0d13d4f0f1dc, PostalCode=401203, S=Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER= 6b7c9269fe100118bd94c76380691e4802b189a40578bdd0fd757c8b8babf6f4, CN= Milan Jackson Alphanso Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.11.06 14:27:16+05'30' Milan Jackson Alphanso