Central Administrative Tribunal
Lloyd Lenny Anthony vs UNION TERRITORY on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 5 O.A./869/2026 (MUMBAI) [ DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 04/11/2026 LLOYD LENNY ANTHONY Vs UNION TERRITORY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Kamalesh P. Mali For Respondent(s) Advocate : Dr. V.S. Masurkar Order of The Tribunal Issue notice to the respondents.
2. Learned counsel Shri Masurkar accepts notice for all the respondents and waives services.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that inquiry was initiated against him in the year 2006 and 2011. The inquiries were not completed for 20 years and 15 years respectively. All of a sudden, vide Order dated 26th October, 2026, respondents i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police has issued an order for completing the departmental enquiries within a period of 15 days from the issuance of this order. He submits that the applicant is himself an inquiry officer in one of the inquiries and he has received this order in that capacity. He further submits that the applicant apprehends that the inquiry officer will complete the inquiry haphazardly and will submit the report hurriedly having regard to the order dated 26th October, 2026 (Annexure- A-1). He, therefore, submits that this order be stayed.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Annexure-A-1 is an internal correspondence of the department. The respondents are trying to complete the inquiries which are long pending. He submits that, therefore, the applicant is not entitled to any relief.
6. The inquiry is pending since the year 2006 and 2011 respectively. In view of this, stand over to 07th December, 2026 for reply and hearing on interim relief. In case of any urgency in the intervening period, the applicant is at liberty to move this Tribunal for interim relief.
Sangam Narain Srivastava Member (A) Justice M.G.Sewlikar Member (J) Nicky Kumari ( )