Central Administrative Tribunal
Sidda Gopaludu vs Mr Parmeswar Funkwal, EAST COAST RAILWAY on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK Order Sheet Item no.: 53 C.P./19/2026 (CUTTACK) In O.A./393/2023 REDUCTION IN PAY Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 10 Order Dated: 04/11/2026 SIDDA GOPALUDU Vs MR PARMESWAR FUNKWAL, EAST COAST RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : S.K.Ojha
For Respondent(s) Advocate : B.R.Swain Order of The Tribunal Heard. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite several opportunities to the alleged contemnors, till now the PPO has not been served on the petitioner. Ld. Counsel appeaing for the alleged contenors submits that the PPO is already ready and the applicant can collect the same fromteh office at Visakhapatnam, which is objected to by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner staing that it is the responsibility of the department to serve the PPO on the petitioner. In the circumstances, the alleged contemnors are directed to send the PPO to the petitioner either through post or by hand and take appropriate steps for release of pension in favour of the applicant, failing which, necessay order may be passed on the next date directing appropriate authorities to appear before this Bench to explain the matter/serve the PPO on the applicant. List the matter on 18.11.2026. Urgent copy of the order be given to Ld Counsel for both sides. Pramod Kumar Das Member (A) SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA Member (J)
Ravi Kumar ( ps )